Be aware that sending it to the wrong journal may slow your publication by months. This last is defined in a number of different ways, including this one: Results and discussion Should the results and discussion be separate or a single section? Figure captions Try to keep the captions short, but still allow the information in the figure though not necessarily the explanation to be understood on its own.
However, in some cases a well made photograph is useful. Take some time and think hard.
Console yourself that good papers are sometimes rejected. If you do this, again, make sure that the new version will be understood.
You ought to be capable of answering the first one to yourself. Further, a really well planned presentation in a figure may make the difference between a reader understanding it or not. Then follow it closely, including its referencing style. This is the key step.
Yes, they read it quickly, but they are experts in the field. Sometimes extra analysis and a different plot will show you things that you missed before. A good guide is to look at the papers that you will cite — papers that are relevant to your work. The materials and methods section of an experimental paper will be based on your lab journal.
A scientific paper typically represents an amount of work on the order of a person-year: A very large majority of probably very good papers are rejected at this stage as being insufficiently important and interesting to attract widespread interest from a very broad readership.
You need to explain what you did in such a way that a competent worker in the field could reproduce it, what apparatus and materials you used and, in nonobvious cases, where you obtained them.
Before you decide, you should ask whether the topic really is in the ambit of that journal. In most cases, putting the legend in the figure rather than the caption, makes it easier for readers to understand.
These journals have the advantage of great speed: Nearly every such suggestion is advice from an expert on how you can make your paper better and more understandable. Although the abstract appears at the beginning, you should write the abstract last. Consider the proportional benefit: Figures Figures are often the most important part of a scientific paper, so please take some time making really good quality figures.
Consider using diagrams for arguments, especially complicated arguments. Who would be interested? Surprisingly often, the delay includes a substantial component from the authors:Introducing a new series on effective writing and publishing of scientific papers.
Kotz D, Cals JW, Tugwell P, Knottnerus JA. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part II: title and abstract.
Cals JW, Kotz D. Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part VI: discussion. Cals JW, Kotz D.
1. J Clin Epidemiol. Jun;66(6) doi: /killarney10mile.compi Epub Feb Effective writing and publishing scientific papers, part II: title and. Effective Writing and Publishing Scientific Papers Part I How to Get Started - Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online.
Writing and publishing a scientific paper. Writing and publishing a scientific paper Figures are often the most important part of a scientific paper, so please take some time making really good quality figures.
Console yourself that good papers are sometimes rejected. Researchers often agree that a 'small step' paper that fits into the.
Full-Text Paper (PDF): Effective writing and publishing scientific papers - Part I: How to get started. 11 steps to structuring a science paper editors will take seriously To achieve good interpretations think about: guiding the readers to your objectives when writing this paper.
State the purpose of the paper and research strategy adopted to answer the question, but do not mix introduction with results, discussion and conclusion.Download